Friday, April 24, 2015

Furmanite Blended Crew Solution - Safest Turnaround Money Can Buy

The need is to be ready to assist our customers with both our highly skilled technicians and specialty tools and machines - whenever they need us, even in peak seasons when personnel resources are strained. That means a commitment from us to offer technicians skilled for various jobs. 
 
The Solution is to cross-train highly skilled line isolation technicians to a help on synergistic tasks. A high-level line isolation technician cross-trains to assist a high-level heat treatment technician; A high-level Line Isolation/Weld Test technician cross-trains to assist a multi-cert NDE technician. In this way highly- specialized technicians are not sitting idle waiting on other vendors to complete a task or service but instead are being fully utilized enabling a single Furmanite technician to provide services previously performed by 2 or 3 individuals.
The Former Approach Previously, our customers would need to hire three or four vendors for the job. Now, Furmanite can provide the technicians needed to enhance safety with one team working together, reducing time to completion, and providing cost savings. Additionally, quality is enhanced by using the same supervisor and team on the project. 
The proof was determined when an independent P6 scheduler who would, utilizing actual turnaround data, calculate the project differences. Both the actual historical former approach and Furmanite Blended Crew solution data were loaded into P6 and the findings calculated.
 
 
The Findings:

  1. An actual scope from a typical 15 sequential cut pipe job was analyzed, including demolition, cold cutting, cut location and machining, line isolation, hydro testing using an HID, mag particle testing, and X-Ray-i.e. "The Real Job Test." 
  2. Durations and man hours were reduced within Blended Crew as there was a sole source of accountability and communication/direction to field craft vs. using multiple vendors. 
  3. Sole source contracting limits the amount of overhead/ indirect hours needed thus reducing the daily/shift head count of people performing non-continuous work in the field. 
  4. Duration of the real job test revealed a reduction in overall duration of 7 days. 
  5. Punch list review reveals that the Blended Crew has indirects/overhead that are 75% less than using multiple vendors. 
Total reduction of Blended Crew man hours was 552 hours, which does not include the reduction of Direct Craft hours lost on waiting for testing/machining or isolation services to perform their task.




P6 Data

 





Project Start Date April 7

Blended CrewSM

Multiple Vendors Contracted

 





Completion Date

May 23

May 29

 





QC/QA Reports

One Source

Four Sources

 





Hours Billed

1,245

1,797

 





Per Diem Days

237

432

 





Lodging Days

237

432

 





Purchase Orders

One

Four

 





Supervisors

One

Four

 





Time on Tools

Continuous

Three crew change outs per joint